- Home /
- Combinatorial Math & Odds Hub /
- HK 6-Step vs Flat Betting (4-Shoe Streak)
STAGE 2 STRESS TEST · HK 6-STEP VS FLAT BETTING
Hong Kong 6-Step Cruise vs. Flat 1-Unit Baseline — Four-Shoe 12-Run Volatility under No-Commission Banker 6 (288-Hand Stress Test)
In head-to-head trial S296-0 across 288 deals (4-Shoe Streak, 1.4579% edge), HK 6-Step records a -72u peak ledger and 31.25% ruin probability on a 180-unit stack, whereas Flat Betting logs a -21u trough and 9.17% ruin under the 100-unit limit. Because every 8-deck coup is statistically independent under No-Commission Banker 6 (0.50:1 on 6) (1.4579% edge), progression rules alter drawdown speed and table-cap collisions without changing per-hand expectation.
- HK 6-Step Ruin Rate
- 31.25%
- Flat Betting Ruin Rate
- 9.17%
- Peak Trough (12-Run)
- -72u
- 4-Shoe Streak House Edge
- 1.4579%