- Home /
- Combinatorial Math & Odds Hub /
- Fibonacci vs Flat Betting (EZ Dragon Streak)
STAGE 2 STRESS TEST · FIBONACCI VS FLAT BETTING
Fibonacci Negative Sequence vs. Flat 1-Unit Baseline — Two-Shoe 10-Deep Streak under EZ Baccarat Dragon 7 Push (148-Hand Stress Test)
Matchup S178-0 benchmarks how a 120-unit roll and 80-unit pit maximum govern Fibonacci versus Flat Betting during 148 hands of EZ Dragon Streak: bankroll-constrained decay-rate divergence pushes primary ruin to 18.72% against 6.01% for the benchmark while inspects 2.11u in commission friction. Because every 8-deck coup is statistically independent under EZ Baccarat 3-Card 7 Push (1.028% edge) (1.0284% edge), progression rules alter drawdown speed and table-cap collisions without changing per-hand expectation.
- Fibonacci Ruin Rate
- 18.72%
- Flat Betting Ruin Rate
- 6.01%
- Peak Trough (10-Run)
- -53u
- EZ Dragon Streak House Edge
- 1.0284%