- Home /
- Combinatorial Math & Odds Hub /
- 2-1-2 Manhattan vs Flat Betting (5% Comm High-Tie)
STAGE 2 STRESS TEST · 2-1-2 MANHATTAN VS FLAT BETTING
2-1-2 Manhattan Progression vs. Flat 1-Unit Baseline — 16% High-Tie Cluster Shoe under 5% Banker Commission (78-Hand Stress Test)
Across 78 resolved and tied deals under 5% Comm High-Tie (1.0579% edge), asymmetric comparison S271-0 models 2-1-2 Manhattan Progression against Flat 1-Unit Baseline on a 75-unit bankroll, showing that 4-hand clusters and a 50-unit ceiling drive 14.56% vs 5.52% stop-loss breaches along the session-bounded decay-rate. Because every 8-deck coup is statistically independent under 5% Banker Commission (0.95:1) (1.0579% edge), progression rules alter drawdown speed and table-cap collisions without changing per-hand expectation.
- 2-1-2 Manhattan Ruin Rate
- 14.56%
- Flat Betting Ruin Rate
- 5.52%
- Peak Trough (4-Run)
- -23u
- 5% Comm High-Tie House Edge
- 1.0579%