- Home /
- Combinatorial Math & Odds Hub /
- 1-3-2-6 vs Flat Betting (No-Comm Streak)
STAGE 2 STRESS TEST · 1-3-2-6 VS FLAT BETTING
1-3-2-6 Four-Stage Sequence vs. Flat 1-Unit Baseline — 11-Hand Banker Run under No-Commission Banker 6 Half-Pay (74-Hand Stress Test)
In head-to-head trial S147-0 across 74 deals (No-Comm Streak, 1.4579% edge), 1-3-2-6 records a -42u peak escalation and 7.90% ruin probability on a 90-unit stack, whereas Flat Betting logs a -21u trough and 4.92% ruin under the 65-unit limit. Because every 8-deck coup is statistically independent under No-Commission Banker 6 (0.50:1 on 6) (1.4579% edge), progression rules alter drawdown speed and table-cap collisions without changing per-hand expectation.
- 1-3-2-6 Ruin Rate
- 7.90%
- Flat Betting Ruin Rate
- 4.92%
- Peak Trough (11-Run)
- -42u
- No-Comm Streak House Edge
- 1.4579%