- Home /
- Combinatorial Math & Odds Hub /
- 1-3-2-6 vs Flat Betting (Player High-Tie)
STAGE 2 STRESS TEST · 1-3-2-6 VS FLAT BETTING
1-3-2-6 Four-Stage Sequence vs. Flat 1-Unit Baseline — Three-Shoe 15% Tie Density on Even-Money Player Wagers (210-Hand Stress Test)
In head-to-head trial S154-0 across 210 deals (Player High-Tie, 1.2351% edge), 1-3-2-6 records a -26u peak dispersion and 21.86% ruin probability on a 130-unit stack, whereas Flat Betting logs a -15u trough and 8.79% ruin under the 85-unit limit. Because every 8-deck coup is statistically independent under Even-Money Player Side (1.235% edge) (1.2351% edge), progression rules alter drawdown speed and table-cap collisions without changing per-hand expectation.
- 1-3-2-6 Ruin Rate
- 21.86%
- Flat Betting Ruin Rate
- 8.79%
- Peak Trough (4-Run)
- -26u
- Player High-Tie House Edge
- 1.2351%