- Home /
- Combinatorial Math & Odds Hub /
- 1-3-2-6 vs Flat Betting (EZ High-Tie)
STAGE 2 STRESS TEST · 1-3-2-6 VS FLAT BETTING
1-3-2-6 Four-Stage Sequence vs. Flat 1-Unit Baseline — Two-Shoe High-Tie Stall under EZ Baccarat Dragon 7 Push (152-Hand Stress Test)
Matchup S151-0 measures how a 110-unit roll and 75-unit pit maximum govern 1-3-2-6 versus Flat Betting during 152 hands of EZ High-Tie: commission-adjusted cadence divergence pushes primary ruin to 18.16% against 6.96% for the benchmark while audits 1.24u in commission friction. Because every 8-deck coup is statistically independent under EZ Baccarat 3-Card 7 Push (1.028% edge) (1.0284% edge), progression rules alter drawdown speed and table-cap collisions without changing per-hand expectation.
- 1-3-2-6 Ruin Rate
- 18.16%
- Flat Betting Ruin Rate
- 6.96%
- Peak Trough (5-Run)
- -25u
- EZ High-Tie House Edge
- 1.0284%