- Home /
- Casinos /
- West Penn vs Macau Penin: Cut & Burn Rules
SHOE PROCEDURE COMPARISON
Western Pennsylvania & Pittsburgh vs. Macau Peninsula Historic Gaming Hub: Shoe Penetration, Cut-Card Placement & Burn-Card Rules
Side-by-side regional comparison of shoe penetration, cut card, and burn rules between Western Pennsylvania & Pittsburgh (Rivers Casino Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) under Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and Macau Peninsula Historic Gaming Hub (Grand Lisboa Macau, Sé & Novos Aterros, Macau SAR) under Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ), covering PGCB 5% & Sup6 versus DICJ Sup6 & 5% settlement, Angel Eye Smart Shoe & Digital Road Monitors versus LT Game Live Multi-Game & Angel Eye Displays scoreboards, and $15 to $25 main pit to HKD $3,000 to $200,000 upper salon table limits.
- West Penn / Macau Penin
- PIT vs MAC
- West Penn Rule Model
- PGCB 5% & Sup6
- Macau Penin Rule Model
- DICJ Sup6 & 5%
- Strictest Floor Age
- 21+