- Home /
- Casinos /
- East Penn vs Macau Cotai: Cut & Burn Rules
SHOE PROCEDURE COMPARISON
Eastern Pennsylvania & Philadelphia vs. Macau Cotai Strip Integrated Resorts: Shoe Penetration, Cut-Card Placement & Burn-Card Rules
Side-by-side regional comparison of shoe penetration, cut card, and burn rules between Eastern Pennsylvania & Philadelphia (Wind Creek Bethlehem, Philadelphia & Bethlehem, Pennsylvania) under Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board and Macau Cotai Strip Integrated Resorts (The Venetian Macao & Wynn Palace Cotai, Cotai, Macau SAR) under Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ), covering PGCB 5% & EZ versus DICJ No-Comm 6 settlement, TCS John Huxley & Angel Eye Electronic Shoes versus LT Game & Angel Eye 5-Road Bead-to-Cockroach Matrix scoreboards, and $25 main floor to HKD $5,000 to $300,000 premium mass salon table limits.
- East Penn / Macau Cotai
- PHL vs MFM
- East Penn Rule Model
- PGCB 5% & EZ
- Macau Cotai Rule Model
- DICJ No-Comm 6
- Strictest Floor Age
- 21+